Preliminary responses
as of June 24, 2010
38 Responses received
1. Do you support creating Reserve Funds as a
way to meet large scale cyclic maintenance project costs:
Yes = 82% No = 16% No Response = 2%
2. Do you support a 1% membership fee paid by new
property owners?
Yes = 76% No = 24%
3. Do you support putting all but 6 Lakeshore lots
into a conservation easement with tax abatement, and putting the tax savings
into a Reserve Fund?
Yes = 92% No = 5% �����Depends on the lot = 3%
4. If you said yes to question 3, please answer
this question: The FC recommended keeping in their current unabated tax
status the six most valuable lots, with value based on the Harding tax
assessment. The committee modified this approach based on Inform Meeting input
suggesting that tax appraisals may not be a good valuation technique. Based on
recommendations from three members of the MKL community active in the real
estate industry, the list of the six most valuable properties was modified. Do
you agree with this method for determining which lots to keep unabated?
�������
Yes = 74% � No = 8% �� ���Depends on the lots = 13% ������ No Answer = 5%
If you answered No to question 4, please suggest
an alternative method for lot selection:
Comments will be
provided
5. Would you like a committee member to contact
you by telephone or in person to discuss some aspect of the FC proposal?
Yes = 3% No = 97%
Please provide any other information/opinion/
Comments will be provided